Sunday, October 11, 2009

Nobel Peace Prize

A famed writer, who brings her Catholic perspective to bear on many public policy issues, has written the definitive commentary on the recent award to our new president, who has—as of yet—no history of exemplary service to humanity over a period of many years that is traditionally connected to this once prestigious award.

An excerpt.

“It is absurd and it is embarrassing. It would even be infuriating if it were not such a declaration of emptiness.

“The Norwegian Nobel Committee has embarrassed itself and cheapened a great award that had real meaning.

“It was a good thing, the Nobel Peace Prize. Every year the giving of it was a matter of note throughout the world, almost a matter of state. It was serious. It mattered that it was given to a woman like Mother Teresa in 1979. She had lived for 30 years with the poorest of the poor; she and her Missionaries of Charity dressed their wounds, healed their illnesses, and literally carried them from the streets to mats and beds in a home where they would at least have in death the thing they had not had in life, someone to care for them. She didn’t just care for them, she did the hard thing: She loved them. Her life was heroic, epic, and when she was given the Nobel Peace Prize, it was as if the world were saying, “You are the best we have. You are living a life that should be emulated....

“This is an award for not being George W. Bush. This is an award for not making the world nervous. This is an award for sharing the basic political sentiments and assumptions of the members of the committee. It is for what Barack Obama may do, not what he has done. He hasn’t done anything.

“In one mindless stroke, the committee has rendered the Nobel Peace Prize a laughingstock, perhaps for as long as a generation. And that is an act of true destruction, because it was actually good that the world had a prestigious award for peacemaking.”